LIVE EXPERIENCE · NO SIGNUP
BatchbindAI formulation & batch traceability
Create a product. Check its ingredients. Trace its batch.
A little inspiration
Local ingredients. New possibilities.- 1. FormulaFormula
- 2. Ingredient checkCheck
- 3. BatchBatch
- 4. ProofProof
Make it yours.
Keep your formula and batch in a free workspace.
Explore More
Product capabilities, preparation & packaging, and market positioning
What Batchbind gives your plant
AI Formulation Studio
Prompt new formulas in plain language. Get cost, stability, and substitution guidance grounded in your ingredient master.
Immutable Batch Ledger
Every release hash-chained and signed. Regulators and buyers verify authenticity with a single link.
Compliance Engine
Assess formulas against NG, KE, EG, GH, EU, and FDA rules. Export a regulator-ready bundle in one click.
Traceability Graph
Ingredients → formulas → batches → shipments. Investigate recalls and audits in minutes, not weeks.
Offline-first PWA
Release batches and capture evidence from the plant floor. Syncs when the network returns.
Preparation & packaging
Plan compounding, filling and packaging requirements alongside your formula and batch records.
Multi-region residency
EU-Central and Africa-West cells honor data-residency rules from day one.
Our claim
Formulation, compliance and proof in one system — usable on the plant floor, verifiable by anyone.
Most manufacturing software asks you to choose: a design tool, a quality system, or a document archive — each assuming reliable bandwidth, a regulatory department, and stable input costs. Batchbind is built for the opposite conditions, and delivers value on four measurable fronts.
Reformulate in hours, not quarters
AI proposes compliant substitutes grounded in your own ingredient master and local sourcing, with cost, stability and regulatory impact shown before you commit.
Value: protect margin when an input price or supply breaks.
Proof that stands without trusting us
Every formula change, batch release and compliance check is hash-chained and signed. A buyer, auditor or regulator verifies the chain independently from a single link.
Value: shorter audits, fewer repeat questions, faster buyer onboarding.
One record, many regulators
Maintained rule packs turn one ledger into the dossier a domestic regulator, an AfCFTA counterpart, a CBAM declaration or an FDA reviewer each expects.
Value: one evidence set instead of one consultant per market.
Works where the network doesn't
Offline-first capture, low-bandwidth floor commands and data residency cells mean the system runs at the site, not only at head office.
Value: records created at the moment of work, not reconstructed later.
We do not position Batchbind against any particular vendor. The comparison that matters is against how the work is done today: spreadsheets, photographed batch sheets, and evidence assembled the week before an audit.
The chain of proof
Every link written once, verifiable by anyone.
Nothing here is a PDF assembled after the fact. Each step is an event in a hash-chained ledger, so breaking one link is visible in all the others.
Supplier lot + CoA captured
Version signed with rationale
Release hash-chained to the previous event
Dossier bound to the destination rule pack
Regulator or buyer checks the chain themselves
By industry
Pick your line. See the answer.
The compliance problem is never generic. Choose a sector to see the specific export blocker and what Batchbind returns.
The problem
An imported emulsifier doubled in price and the EU restricted a preservative already in your face cream.
Corridor
NAFDAC → EU 1223/2009
You ask
“Reformulate my face cream for shea butter instead of palm oil, NAFDAC-compliant and EU exportable.”
Batchbind returns
- Substitution
- Palm-derived emulsifier → shea-based wax (locally sourced)
- Unit cost
- −31% per kg at today's FX rate
- Compliance
- Passes NAFDAC and EU 1223/2009 rule packs
- Label
- INCI list regenerated; allergen line updated
Where we fit
Emerging-market manufacturers don't lack products. They lack proof.
PLM and quality software was built for large Western manufacturers with dedicated regulatory departments — priced and scoped accordingly. The fastest-growing manufacturing base in the world runs instead on spreadsheets, photos of batch sheets, and a consultant hired the week before an audit. They can make the product. What they cannot reliably produce is a defensible record of how it was made.
| Segment | Today's tools | What Batchbind adds |
|---|---|---|
| Brand owners & OEM importers | Factory spec sheets, no dossier | Registration dossiers and batch-level traceability they own |
| Local contract manufacturers | Paper batch records | Signed release records with strict formula-IP separation per client |
| Exporters into EU / US | Consultants per shipment | CBAM, REACH and FDA-ready bundles generated from the ledger |
The liability never transfers
A contract manufacturer supplies a specification, not a NAFDAC dossier, a CBAM declaration, or batch traceability. The brand owner still has to prove it.
Currency shocks force reformulation
When an imported input doubles in price, producers need a locally sourceable equivalent that stays compliant. That is what the AI studio answers.
Proof is the moat
A hash-chained, signed ledger plus maintained regulator rule packs means a third party can verify a batch without trusting us.
Early signals
Built with manufacturers in Nigeria, Kenya and Egypt.
Batchbind is in pilot. The workflows come from the people doing the work: a brand owner who cannot get a dossier from their factory, a contract manufacturer keeping two clients' formulas apart on paper, an exporter paying a consultant per shipment.
“The factory gives us a spec sheet. The regulator wants a history. That gap is the whole problem.”
“When the naira moves, we need a compliant substitute the same week — not after the next lab cycle.”
“Every buyer audit starts from zero because nothing we send can be checked without us.”
Pilot conversations, paraphrased. Named references published as pilots complete.